Strategy Dynamics Briefing 60: Competing for staff

Posted by:

Competition for staff is widespread, not only in corporate settings but in non-profit and public sectors too. Rivalry for highly skilled and experienced people can be so ferocious that it is sometimes known as the ‘war for talent’. Less-skilled staff can be scarce too, so rivalry for employees concerns most organizations at some time. Type-1 rivalry to hire new staff and type-2, to persuade staff to switch from competitors, dominate this issue, since it is rare for staff to work ...

Continue Reading →

Strategy Dynamics Briefing 59: Competing through intermediaries

Posted by:

Intermediaries give rise to powerful type-3 rivalry, both in B2C and B2B cases. Often, a key objective for suppliers is to capture more share of the intermediaries’ attention, so they promote the supplier’s product more strongly to the end-customer.
Attention” comes in various forms:

  • A consumer-goods producer wants retailers to allocate a larger share of shelf space to its product than to rival products in the same category.
  • Business supplies companies fight for more pages in distributors’ catalogues than competitors.
  • Insurance companies want ...
Continue Reading →

Strategy Dynamics Briefing 58: Varying Customer Characteristics

Posted by:

Customers usually differ from each other on many factors – purchase rates, price sensitivity, switching costs, rationality, time to respond etc. – and these differences affect the dynamics of competition. The table below gives some illustrative characteristics for two distinct customer groups in the electricity market discussed in Briefing 57.

Low users High users
Fraction of customers in each group 0.7 0.3
Quarterly usage $400 $600
Continue Reading →

Strategy Dynamics Briefing 57: Switching costs, delays and limited rationality in customer choices

Posted by:

Recent briefings have made some simplifying assumptions – that customers switch between rivals for any gain, no matter how small, that they do so instantly, and that they always work out what’s economically optimal – none of which are very realistic!

  1. Switching can require time and effort. Some costs are real, financial expenses. A Windows-PC user switching to a Mac would have to spend a lot on new software. There would also be non-financial costs, such as learning how the new ...
Continue Reading →

StrategyDynamics Briefing 56: Rivalry in project-based industries

Posted by:

In industries where customers buy substantial projects, each contract is effectively a case of type-1 rivalry – either we win it, or a competitor does. Examples include construction projects in civil engineering or process industries, IT projects for government departments, and large consultancy studies. Customers usually ask possible suppliers to submit bids for a project, issuing “invitations to tender” (ITTs) or “requests for proposal” (RFPs). Although suppliers would prefer a continuing relationship, to enjoy a steady stream of all of ...

Continue Reading →
Page 1 of 69 12345...»